Negotiating Climate Change as if Development Really Mattered

Worldwatch Climate and Energy Director Alexander Ochs emphasizes the need to focus on what can be won, both in terms of climate and development, through the decarbonization of human activities. This article was originally published in Outreach Magazine on November 18, 2013.



Alexander Ochs is Director of Worldwatch's Climate and Energy Program.
Related Posts
As Next Round of Climate Talks Near, Poland Faces Tough Choices
From the Back Seat to Behind the Wheel: Poland and the Climate Negotiations
Read More

Over the past twenty years, climate negotiations have been dominated by concerns that addressing global warming is anti-business and onerous to future development. The insufficient progress we have made at the last 18 COPs towards ‘preventing dangerous human interference with the climate system,’ the ultimate goal of the UN Climate Convention, is a consequence of this—and the recent summit in Warsaw has not exactly been on course to make a change. Working in many places around the world, from Haiti to India to Europe and the United States, I have witnessed little success in convincing people of the importance of sacrifice for the global commons. This approach has proven ineffective.

I wrote in this publication a couple of years ago that ‘new energy for the negotiations’ was needed. The article’s title, of course, was a play on words. More than anything else we need to quickly transition to new energy systems built on efficient consumption and renewable resources, as well as decentralized and smart transmission solutions, in order to decarbonize our societies and help them to adapt to climate change. But we also need new, renewable and sustainable energy for the negotiations. Discussing climate mitigation as what can be won, rather than what must be given up, and a strategy that at its core builds on the experiences that already have been made in many places around the world on the way to building low-emissions economies might not just inspire on-the-ground action but also revitalize international partnership and ambition.

COP19/CMP9 President His Excellency Mr. Marcin Korolec addressing delegates at the conference opening. Photo credit: UNFCCC.

Aristotle suggested that every human action has a goal (‘telos’), and that the ultimate goal of all human actions is our pursuit of happiness. Constructing sustainability as a cause for the constraint of human action certainly does not evoke the idea of a yardstick for achieving happiness, nor, most likely, unity among actors. On all levels of organization, from individuals reflecting on their lifestyles, to municipalities occupied with urban planning to provinces, and federal governments facing vested interests in the unconstrained burning of fossil fuels—I am convinced that we will be able to change course faster and more consistently if we are aware of what can be won: a more peaceful world, sustained economies with better jobs, greener and safer cities, and happier and healthier lives in intact environments.

The recent pictures from the devastation that Typhoon Haiyan left behind gives us a sense of what more frequent and extreme weather events have in store for us. Without doubt, there are very real limits to our behavior that we must consider. Science tells us with increasing confidence where these thresholds of our joint actions need to be, suggesting a maximum global temperature increase and corresponding atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. In order to reach the level of ambition necessary to stay within our limits, however, we can now build on the remarkable successes that have been achieved in decarbonizing human actions in many places worldwide. And what we will find by analyzing the frontrunners of low-emissions development is that they are not worse but better off than those that are trailing behind—economically, socially and, needless to mention, environmentally.

Starting from these climate and development success stories, we have to identify real and actionable goals. We might find that we can be much more ambitious than we thought, and that reaching the necessary greenhouse gas reduction targets might be easier than commonly portrayed. Our transition to sustainable societies will be good for us, our cities, our countries, and our planet. Our climate and development discourses have started from different conceptualizations for too long. To successfully address these existential areas of decision making, the answers will be the same.

Carousel image credit: WIkicommons User Marcello Casal JR/ABr