Analysis: Could an “Age of Green Economics” Be on the Horizon?
In a remarkable step into the worlds of high finance and climate politics, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was in Chicago last week to encourage U.S. business leaders to help reshape the world’s economic future by investing in low-carbon markets.
In a February 7 speech to the Economic Club of Chicago, Secretary-General Ban asked his audience to enter an “age of green economics,” with the United Nations as a partner.
Echoing the conclusions of the recent report State of the World 2008, published by the Worldwatch Institute last month, Ban said, “Done right, our war against climate change is an economic opportunity, not a cost.”
Ban quoted U.N. Environment Programme estimates that global investment in “zero-greenhouse energy” will reach $1.9 trillion by 2020—what he termed “seed money for a wholesale reconfiguration of global industry.”
Ban’s prediction reflects the growing trend among venture capitalists and private equity investors who are banking on the clean energy sector. According to State of the World 2008, an estimated $52 billion was invested in renewable energy worldwide in 2006, up 33 percent from 2005.
Overall, socially responsible investments are growing in popularity. The investments, which promote sustainable economic growth through socially responsible or green enterprises, reached $2.29 trillion in the United States in 2005, more than tripling since 1995, according to the Social Investment Forum. Many of these investments are paying off. Wind, solar, and bioenergy are taking off as their costs become more competitive with fossil fuels.
Chicago is home to the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), the world’s first voluntary carbon credit market. Similar to the European Union’s Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), the exchange trades the right to emit greenhouse gases among industries who pollute and those who support carbon sequestration or clean energy. The exchange, run by its members who keep their standards private, has traded nearly 4 million tons of carbon since its 2003 opening. The market announced its busiest month of trading one day after Ban’s speech.
But the CCX is still a voluntary market. To reach the United Nations’ carbon-cutting goals, the United States and developing countries such as China and India must establish greater incentives or more stringent regulations that encourage sustained growth among the world’s green-collar industries, while energy efficiency and carbon sequestration must improve as well. The Chicago speech is a clear indication of Secretary-General Ban’s willingness to forge a strong post-Kyoto climate agreement that includes the United States and China, the world’s two largest emitters.
Intern Ben Block, an observer of the world's environmental challenges, has traveled from Nicaragua's rural pharmacies to Brazil's mahogany plantations to the Jordan River's drying shores. Ben recently graduated from the University of Maryland – College Park with degrees in journalism and environmental science.

Comments
What does he mean by
What does he mean by economic opportunity? How can we stop the climate change without closing the polluting factories? --- link building companyIs carbon trading the solution to combating climate change?
There is a lot of interest in carbon trading. Many businesses have spotted how to profit from the trade. Others see how they can use it to avoid or delay taking action to reduce their own emissions through paying for reduction elsewhere in the world economy. In theory this will work. But is the carbon market really the solution to combating climate change?
We have seen how from the initial surge of interest in bio fuels, that the real issues take time to surface. We can now see that bio fuels require very careful stewardship and controls.
The carbon market too, needs very tight oversight if it is to succeed in moving society beyond fossil fuels. I have read very little so far that expose the true long-term outcomes of a poorly regulated carbon market. This is one of the many issues I have written about in my book, 'Adapt and Thrive: The Sustainable Revolution' to be published in the UK next week. I explain the danger that the carbon market becomes a smoke-screen for inaction with little more value than a lottery unless we agree and implement robust controls.
If you are interested in my views and analysis you might find my weekly blog interesting: Peter McManners
Peter McManners
Green and Socially Responsible Investing
Until the problem of climate change abates, investing in ways to both combat and accommodate it will flourish, whether it be carbon markets or green investing. I'm delighted to see your coverage of socially responsible investing too. Now discerning what will be successful among these responses and actions is another matter!
For your information, I've been following socially responsible investing for around forty years and interested readers in this subject might find my website useful. It covers all the latest global green and socially responsible investing news at www.investingforthesoul.com
Best wishes, Ron Robins