Pope Benedict: Laying the Groundwork for a Sustainable Civilization?

by Gary Gardner on April 15, 2008

Pope BenedictRumor has it that Pope Benedict may address climate change during his visit to the United Nations this week. Whether he does or not, his young papacy can claim to be the "greenest" ever. Benedict has identified extensive common ground between sustainability concerns and a Catholic worldview - adding weight to the argument that the world's religions could be instrumental in nudging policymakers and the public to embrace sustainability. Now, the Pope has the opportunity to further develop the links between sustainability and religious values, markedly advancing thinking in both arenas.

Benedict's predecessor, John Paul II, made important environmental statements during his long papacy, but Benedict is the first "green pope." Last year, the Vatican installed solar panels on its 10,000-seat main auditorium building, and it arranged to reforest land in Hungary to offset Vatican City's carbon emissions, making it the world's first carbon-neutral state. And Benedict has repeatedly urged protection of the environment and action against poverty in a number of major addresses. His next encyclical (major papal teaching), due out this summer, is expected to further wrestle with environmental, social, and other themes of interest to the sustainability community.

As he embraces these themes, Benedict and the larger Catholic community could play an especially valuable role in helping to address two major influences on the environment that get too little attention today: consumption and population. (A third, technology, already receives high levels of policy focus.)

The consumption question should be comfortable ground for a modern Catholic pope, given the longstanding social and spiritual critique of consumerism in Catholic thought. For example, Pope Paul VI, in his 1967 encyclical Populorum Progressio, linked heavy consumption to injustice, declaring that, "No one may appropriate surplus goods solely for his own private use when others lack the bare necessities of life.... The earth belongs to everyone, not to the rich."

John Paul II added a spiritual dimension in Centesimus Annus in 1991, critiquing "a style of life which is presumed to be better when it is directed towards ‘having' rather than 'being,'" and urging people to "create life-styles in which the quest for truth, beauty, goodness and communion with others for the sake of common growth are the factors which determine consumer choices, savings and investments." The Church's spiritual and social teachings are rich complements to modern environmental arguments against consumerism.

Benedict's challenge is to move longstanding Church teaching into concrete action. Despite the extensive archive of papal statements on the subject, there is no evidence that Catholics consume less or differently than anyone else. Yet given that 40 percent of the human family lives on less than $2 a day while the prosperous among us consume casually and wastefully, Catholic leadership in redefining "the good life" away from accumulation and toward greater human wellbeing and solidarity with the poor cannot come soon enough.

Benedict will need to be creative in persuading the comfortable in his Church to take consumption teachings seriously. The dramatic equivalent of solar panels on a Vatican rooftop may be needed to move prosperous Catholics to critically assess their own consumption-and to find joy in consuming less.

The other issue, population, is more difficult for a Catholic leader to tackle, especially one with Benedict's reputation for doctrinal strictness. For Benedict and most Catholics, human reproduction is a domain infused with questions of deep personal morality. But a pontiff who appreciates the epochal nature of the sustainability crisis must surely also recognize the moral challenges raised when human numbers grow exponentially in a finite world.

How much of modern hunger, disease, poverty, and environmental degradation can be blamed on population sizes that have exceeded the carrying capacity of local, regional, and global environments? The share is unknowable, but surely not small. The challenge for Benedict will be to apply his formidable intellect to harmonize the personal and social ethics of population issues.

Benedict's interest in sustainability issues comes not a moment too soon. The sustainability crisis is civilizational in scope and depth-and therefore a natural concern for a global institution like the Catholic Church. Should Benedict raise the twin issues of consumption and population to the level of theological and spiritual attention they deserve, he would not only advance thinking on religious ethics-but also on how to create just and environmentally sustainable societies.

Gary Gardner is a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, an environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C. He is the author of the book Inspiring Progress: Religions' Contributions to Sustainable Development.

 

Comments

Gary. It is wonderful that

Gary. It is wonderful that the pope & the vatican are opening up so much. i thought it was wonderful the things he said at catholic university upon his visit. the remarks about education & pluralism were so true. Yet, you are so right that this is just the beginning. being green & environmentally concerned is of the esssence, and according to the apocryphal book of wisdom & other old testament scriptures & a few words from yeshua himself in his revelation -- the church should have been more involved decades ago in preaching & upholding these crucial truthes. now i hear you loud & clear about the population concern. this is something the whole church of yeshua in christ is going to have to fess up to--- catholic, protestant, spiritualist, wiccan, universalist, nae, & otherwise. all things that can contain & slow the population unstability problem are then logically going to be the answer; right?? and if one of the largest answers is that crucial, and it's not being believed as a major solution simply because of biased heterodox traditional mosaic law that denies the ultimate scientific common sense of the matter, then we continue to have an unnecessary ridiculous problem. if god is love & the logic of christ is the answer, then we best believe it & how it manifests & relates to "all things." "all things indeed are pure, but to the defiled & unbelieving, nothing (or maybe even No Thing) is pure." loving enlightenment is pure, even if & when it is gay--frangelican. if you read revelations 14.4&5 with a logically enlightened open mind, you cannot help but see what jesus is saying; and that He fully understood all things; even being gay. the church is going to have to understand why saint paul said the things he said, "seemingly" following mosaic law, although being in Christ. obviously jesus in revelations 14.4&5 is "at variance" (to use Muhammed's lingo)with the mosaic law against gay relationships. this would present a certain amount of confusion to a typical traditional fundamentalist mind set. why does paul say one thing & jesus another? well, there has to be a logical reason; and the reason is found in the logical good reasoning of understanding the whole of religion & politics in context with the times. (i've already given the explanatory answer for any who are willing to listen). when the church decides to see the light & "obey her husband jesus" instead of wanting to have her own way, then she will give up the double minded unstable hypcrisy and see that Jesus & the Unity of All Being in Christ is the only solution. Being gay will create more angels & frangels & friends, without excessive procreation & unnecessary procreation, which only adds to the problem of population instability. When people are ignorant & brainwashed, like the church has kept the western civilization, over-population is going to occur; and it has; and it's a global problem. and there ain't gona be no imaginary "rapture" to solve the problem. we face the truth as the human race and work it all out in accordance with the truth of reality & the reality of the truth. shalom sala'am saad, diana yesukadim douglas.

Population growth (9 billion

Population growth (9 billion by 2050) poses a great challenge to the planet and the Catholic church's dogma on contraception and birth control, conceived in a different era. Unfortunately I cannot see this or any other pope getting to grips with something so key in defining the Catholic faith without a major schism emerging. The world of enlightened Catholics and non-Catholics needs to make it clear to him that the existing teaching on contraception is not acceptable. Brendan Dunphy - Innovation, Thought Leadership & Sustainability

Thanks, Aubrey. I don't

Thanks, Aubrey. I don't know of any specific interest on the part of the pope in supporting the Contraction and Convergence concept and the Global Ethic work of Hans Kung. On the upside, I think your work at C&C and Kung's work on the Global Ethic are consistent with Benedict's worldview. The question is how specifically involved he would want to be with particular initiatives. His address to the United Nations this morning was framed at the level of principle, and while consistent with many of the things we stand for here, was not terribly specific in terms of initiatives. (But climate change was one of the few specific areas of concern he mentioned.) You may want to be in touch with the Global Ethic project in Germany to get a sense of how to further the C&C work with not just the Vatican, but many world religions. Contact me at ggardner@worldwatch.org if you'd like to discuss further. And thanks for all the good work you are doing... Gary

To Gary Gardener - Thank

To Gary Gardener - Thank you for this thoughtful piece giving a steer to the Pope at this time. I welcome that in your nice book "Inspiring Progress: Religions' Contributions to Sustainable Development" that you are proposing the Earth Charter and Contraction and Convergence [C&C] as exemplifying the "Global Ethic" that you are highlighting the need for. We very much agree with you on this. Do you feel there is any chance that Pope is likeminded on this? Has he read your book do you know, and will he respond positively to the position taken? His seemingly rapturous reception in the US would be especially meaningful if so. With kind regards - Aubrey Meyer - GCI